Autism-pedia / Causes and genetics / Causes and geneticsbrianspringer.com

Causes and genetics

An overview of what the research does and does not settle about the causes of autism: the claims the evidence rules out, the ones it has not tested, how to tell a causal claim from an association, and what the genetic and pregnancy evidence can and cannot say about one person. Each section links to a full entry.

What research does and does not settle about what causes autism, how genes and pregnancy fit in, and how to tell a real cause from a coincidence.

Last reviewed 12 October 2026 · one person's reading of the research · 44 sources

Contested causes: vaccines, acetaminophen and leucovorin Established

Two claims about what causes autism are settled in the research, even though both are still argued over in public. Vaccines do not cause autism: national cohorts in Denmark and the United States and pooled analyses agree, across the measles-mumps-rubella vaccine, thimerosal-containing vaccines and aluminum-adjuvanted vaccines.1,2,3 Prenatal acetaminophen is not shown to raise the likelihood of autism: studies that compare siblings in the same family, one exposed before birth and one not, find no association, while ordinary cohort studies that cannot control for family factors report a small one.4,5,6 A third claim, that leucovorin treats autism, is not settled, and the trial most often cited for it was retracted on 29 January 2026.7 The entry also records, as dated documents rather than evidence, what US health bodies said and did about these three subjects in 2025 and 2026.

Full entryContested causes: vaccines, acetaminophen and leucovorin What the evidence shows about three causes that are widely argued about, and what US health bodies claimed about them in 2025 and 2026.

People argue about what causes autism. Research has settled two of the answers. First, vaccines do not cause autism. Big studies in Denmark and the United States all agree. So do reviews that combine many other studies. That covers the MMR vaccine and other vaccines people worry about.1,2,3 Second, taking acetaminophen while pregnant is not shown to make autism more likely. Acetaminophen is a common painkiller. Studies that compare two children in the same family find no link. In these studies, only one child was exposed before birth.4,5,6 A third claim is not settled. It says a vitamin-like drug called leucovorin treats autism. The study most often used to support it was taken back by its journal in January 2026.7

Full entryContested causes: vaccines, acetaminophen and leucovorin Three things people say cause autism. Scientists have studied all three. Here is what they found.
Suggest a correction
Established

Summarizes Contested causes. The vaccine finding rests on national cohorts and pooled analyses that agree, and the acetaminophen finding on family-controlled studies. The leucovorin claim rests on small trials, one of them retracted, and the entry labels it that way.

Established

Big studies that agree with each other settle the vaccine and painkiller questions. The vitamin question is not settled, and the study people point to was taken back.

Heritability and families Established

Heritability is the share of the differences between people in a trait, in one population at one time, that is linked to genetic differences, and it is not a person's chance of being autistic.8 Pooling the twin studies that met a systematic recruitment standard gave about 64% to 91%, and a five-country register analysis of about 2 million children put the median at 80.8%, with country estimates from about 51% to 87%.9,10 Most of the genetic contribution lies in common variants, each with a small effect; rare de novo mutations matter greatly to the person who carries one but account for only a small share of the variation in the population.11 Sub-diagnostic autistic traits are more common in the relatives of autistic people, a pattern called the broader autism phenotype.12 A sibling's risk is raised: in a prospective high-risk cohort about 1 in 5 younger siblings of an autistic child were autistic, a higher figure than whole-population registers give.13,14 No study found as of October 2026 has measured directly how often the children of autistic parents are autistic.

Full entryHeritability and families How twin and family studies estimate the heritability of autism, what that figure does and does not mean, and what autistic people and their families can take from it.

Heritability is how much of the difference between people comes from their genes. It describes a whole group of people, not one person. It does not tell you your own chance of being autistic.8 Pooling twin studies gives a range of about 64% to 91%. A study of about 2 million children in five countries put the middle figure at 80.8%.9,10 Most of the effect comes from many common gene versions. Each one has a small effect. Rare new changes matter a lot for the person who has one. They are a small part of the whole picture.11 Many relatives of autistic people have autistic traits without ever being diagnosed.12 If one child is autistic, about 1 in 5 younger brothers and sisters are autistic too. Whole-country records give a lower figure.13,14 No study found as of October 2026 has measured how often the children of autistic parents are autistic.

Full entryHeritability and families How scientists work out how much of autism comes from genes, what that number really means, and what families can expect.
Suggest a correction
Established

Summarizes Heritability and families. Twin studies and whole-population registers agree that genetic differences account for much of the variation in who is autistic, and the broader autism phenotype and the raised sibling risk are replicated. The estimate itself moves with the population and the model, and the female protective effect and parental age are weaker findings.

Established

Twin studies and whole-country records agree that genes explain a lot. Many relatives have autistic traits without a diagnosis. A brother or sister of an autistic child is also more likely to be autistic.

Genes and the genome Established

A large share of autism's genetic contribution comes from common variants, each with a small effect: a genome-wide association study pooling 18,381 autistic people found five associated loci.15 Rare and de novo variants matter in a minority of cases, with copy-number variants carrying the greatest relative risk, and the genes they disrupt cluster in early brain development and in how neurons communicate.16 Curated gene lists grow with the sample and the threshold: 102 genes in one exome study, 72 at a stricter threshold in a larger analysis, and 253 in a 2026 preprint.17,16,18 A minority of autistic people have a single-gene condition, such as fragile X syndrome or tuberous sclerosis complex, where about 30% of children are autistic, or a recurrent copy-number variant.19,20 Most genomic samples are of European ancestry, and polygenic scores built from them transfer poorly to other ancestries.21 A polygenic score for autism is a research tool, with a correlation of about 0.16 with a diagnosis and no clinical use.22 Clinical testing finds a pathogenic result in a minority of children, and the most common result is that no single-gene cause is found.23,24

Full entryGenes and the genome How autism's genetic contribution is built, from many common variants of small effect and a minority of rare and de novo variants to a small share of single-gene conditions, and what a clinical genetic test can and cannot find.

A large share of the genetic effect comes from common gene versions that many people carry. Each one changes the chance only a little.15 Rare and new changes matter in a small number of people. Copy-number variants carry the most risk.16 Lists of autism genes keep growing. One study found 102 genes, another found 72, and a 2026 preprint found 253.17,16,18 A small number of autistic people have a single-gene condition, such as fragile X syndrome or tuberous sclerosis complex.19,20 Most gene studies have been done in people of European ancestry, so what they find may not fit everyone.21 A polygenic score for autism is a research tool. It is not used in clinics.22 A gene test finds a cause in only a small number of children. Most of the time it finds nothing.23,24

Full entryGenes and the genome How genes shape autism. A large share comes from many common gene changes with small effects. A few people have a single gene change that a test can find.
Suggest a correction
Established

Summarizes Genes and the genome. Large genome-wide association and sequencing studies agree on the shape of the genetic contribution and on what a clinical test finds, and a meta-analysis supports the finding that the polygenic score is not clinically useful. The gene lists themselves are still moving, and the newest counts come from a preprint.

Established

Large gene studies agree on the shape of the picture. Most of the effect comes from many common gene versions. A gene test finds a clear cause in only a small number of people.

Environment and pregnancy: what holds up Emerging

Almost every finding about pregnancy exposures is an association, and the strongest designs compare siblings who differ in whether they were exposed.25 Gestational valproate is the one exposure here with evidence pointing toward a causal effect: a US cohort found a hazard ratio of 2.67 while the drug it served as a positive control for was null, a 2025 meta-analysis of eight cohorts pooling more than six million people found 3.10, rising above about one gram a day, and the association survived a sibling comparison.26,27 The US label treats it as a known risk, and as of October 2026 it says exposure in pregnancy "may be associated with an increased risk" of autism, with adjusted estimates across studies from 1.6 to 6.4.28 Parental age is associated with autism, at about 1.4 to 1.6 times the likelihood in the highest age categories, a modest association whose proposed mechanism is untested.29 Antidepressant use, maternal diabetes, preterm birth and infection are associated in cohorts, and the family and negative-control designs that have been run attenuate most of them: the sibling comparison for infection fell to no association, and a father's antidepressant use was associated too.30,31,32 Air pollution and phthalates show small and inconsistent associations, and the folate finding is a protective association that is probably confounded.33,34 The maternal-antibody hypothesis holds that some autism begins before birth when a mother's antibodies bind proteins in the developing brain; the antibodies are found more often in mothers of autistic children, and no human study shows that they cause autism.35

Full entryEnvironment and pregnancy: what holds up What studies of pregnancy exposures can and cannot show: valproate is the one exposure with evidence pointing toward a causal effect, parental age a consistent but modest association, and most other links are weak or explained by shared family factors.

Most things said to cause autism before birth are links, not causes. The best studies compare two children in the same family who were not exposed the same way.25 One medicine stands out. Valproate is taken for epilepsy and for mood. Children exposed to it before birth are more often autistic. The link held up when siblings were compared.26,27 The US label treats it as a known risk. As of October 2026 it says the medicine may be linked to a higher chance of autism.28 Older parents are a little more likely to have an autistic child. The link is small and no one knows why it happens.29 Antidepressants, diabetes in pregnancy, being born early and infection are all linked in some studies. When researchers compare siblings, most of those links get weaker or disappear.30,31,32 Air pollution and plastics show small and uneven links. Folic acid looks protective, but that is probably not the whole story.33,34 One idea says some autism starts before birth when a mother's antibodies affect the growing brain. The antibodies are found more often in mothers of autistic children. No study in people shows that they cause autism.35

Full entryEnvironment and pregnancy: what holds up What scientists have learned about things that happen during pregnancy and autism. A few things matter. Most do not.
Suggest a correction
Emerging

Summarizes Environment and pregnancy: what holds up. Valproate is the one exposure with evidence pointing toward a causal effect, and parental age is a consistent but modest association. The rest of the links are weak or disappear in family designs, and the maternal-antibody account is a hypothesis about a subgroup.

Emerging

One medicine, valproate, has evidence pointing toward a real effect. Older parents are a little more likely to have an autistic child. Most other links are weak or turn out to be about the family instead.

Embryo screening, polygenic scores and eugenics fears Emerging

Preimplantation genetic testing for polygenic disorders genotypes embryos created during IVF and returns a polygenic risk score for each one. As of October 2026 at least one company advertises an autism risk estimate to people having IVF.36,37 The models agree that the absolute gain is small: about 3 centimeters of height and 3 IQ points from choosing the highest-scoring of about ten embryos, modeled relative risk reductions of 15 to 35 percent for a single disease in a second analysis, and about 1 to 3 percent in a 2026 preprint that modeled real IVF cycles.38,39,40 A polygenic score for autism has a meta-analytic correlation of about 0.16 with a diagnosis and no clinical utility, and no study found as of October 2026 reports a validated polygenic embryo score for autism.22,37 Most professional bodies that have issued statements, including the European Society of Human Genetics in 2022 and the American Society for Reproductive Medicine in 2026, say the practice is not ready for clinical use; the companies dispute that.41,42 Surveys of autistic adults find most raise concerns about eugenics, and a nationally representative survey of US adults found disapproval of screening for traits was more strongly tied to concern about eugenics than disapproval of screening for conditions.43,44

Full entryEmbryo screening, polygenic scores and eugenics fears What companies sell as embryo screening, how little a polygenic score predicts for one embryo, what professional bodies say about it, and the history and the eugenics question behind it.

Some companies score embryos made during IVF and give each one a number. The number is meant to show the chance of a condition later in life. As of October 2026 at least one company sells an autism risk estimate to people having IVF.36,37 The gain is small. Picking the best of about ten embryos added only a little. One study found about 3 centimeters of height and about 3 IQ points.38,39,40 A polygenic score for autism is a research tool, not a clinic test. No study found as of October 2026 shows a working embryo score for autism.22,37 Most expert bodies say the practice is not ready for patients. That includes the European Society of Human Genetics in 2022 and the American Society for Reproductive Medicine in 2026. The companies disagree.41,42 Autistic adults who were asked mostly raised concerns about eugenics.43 A survey of US adults found more worry about eugenics when embryos were scored for traits than for diseases.44

Full entryEmbryo screening, polygenic scores and eugenics fears What companies sell as embryo screening, how little a gene score can say about one embryo, what expert groups say, and the history and fears behind it.
Suggest a correction
Emerging

Summarizes Embryo screening, polygenic scores and eugenics fears. The facts about what companies sell and what professional bodies have said are dated documents and are settled. The estimates of what screening gains come from modeling and simulation, not from following screened children, and the question of whether it is eugenics is reported as the contested question it is.

Emerging

Companies sell a score for embryos made in IVF. The gain is small, and most experts say it is not ready for use. Autistic people who were asked mostly raised concerns about eugenics.

Sources

  1. 1Hviid A, Hansen JV, Frisch M, Melbye M. Measles, Mumps, Rubella Vaccination and Autism: A Nationwide Cohort Study. Annals of Internal Medicine, 2019. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-2101
  2. 2Taylor LE, Swerdfeger AL, Eslick GD. Vaccines are not associated with autism: an evidence-based meta-analysis of case-control and cohort studies. Vaccine, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.04.085
  3. 3Andersson NW, Bech Svalgaard I, Hoffmann SS, Hviid A. Aluminum-Adsorbed Vaccines and Chronic Diseases in Childhood: A Nationwide Cohort Study. Annals of Internal Medicine, 2025. https://doi.org/10.7326/annals-25-00997
  4. 4Luo S, Gong Q, Ai Y, et al. Prenatal Acetaminophen (Paracetamol) Use and the Risk of Autism and/or Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Among Sibling-Matched Cohorts. JAMA Internal Medicine, 2026. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2026.2215
  5. 5Ahlqvist VH, Sjöqvist H, Dalman C, et al. Acetaminophen Use During Pregnancy and Children's Risk of Autism, ADHD, and Intellectual Disability. JAMA, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2024.3172
  6. 6Sheikh J, Allotey J, Sobhy S, et al. Maternal paracetamol (acetaminophen) use during pregnancy and risk of autism spectrum disorder and attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder in offspring: umbrella review of systematic reviews. BMJ, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2025-088141
  7. 7Panda PK, Sharawat IK, Saha S, Gupta D, Palayullakandi A, Meena K. Efficacy of oral folinic acid supplementation in children with autism spectrum disorder: a randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. European Journal of Pediatrics, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-026-06769-x
  8. 8Visscher PM, Hill WG, Wray NR. Heritability in the genomics era: concepts and misconceptions. Nature Reviews Genetics, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2322
  9. 9Tick B, Bolton P, Happé F, Rutter M, Rijsdijk F. Heritability of autism spectrum disorders: a meta-analysis of twin studies. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12499
  10. 10Bai D, Yip BHK, Windham GC, et al. Association of Genetic and Environmental Factors With Autism in a 5-Country Cohort. JAMA Psychiatry, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.1411
  11. 11Gaugler T, Klei L, Sanders SJ, et al. Most genetic risk for autism resides with common variation. Nature Genetics, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.3039
  12. 12Sucksmith E, Roth I, Hoekstra RA. Autistic Traits Below the Clinical Threshold: Re-examining the Broader Autism Phenotype in the 21st Century. Neuropsychology Review, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-011-9183-9
  13. 13Ozonoff S, Young GS, Bradshaw J, et al. Familial Recurrence of Autism: Updates From the Baby Siblings Research Consortium. Pediatrics, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2023-065297
  14. 14Sandin S, Lichtenstein P, Kuja-Halkola R, Larsson H, Hultman C, Reichenberg A. The Familial Risk of Autism. JAMA, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.4144
  15. 15Grove J, Ripke S, Als TD, et al. Identification of common genetic risk variants for autism spectrum disorder. Nature Genetics, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-019-0344-8
  16. 16Fu JM, Satterstrom FK, Peng M, et al. Rare coding variation provides insight into the genetic architecture and phenotypic context of autism. Nature Genetics, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-022-01104-0
  17. 17Satterstrom FK, Kosmicki JA, Wang J, et al. Large-Scale Exome Sequencing Study Implicates Both Developmental and Functional Changes in the Neurobiology of Autism. Cell, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2019.12.036
  18. 18Satterstrom FK, Auwerx C, Fu JM, et al. Rare variation illuminates the distinct and pleiotropic genetic architecture of autism across neuropsychiatric traits. medRxiv, 2026 (preprint, not peer reviewed). https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.08.24.26360398
  19. 19Marlborough M, Welham A, Jones C, et al. Autism spectrum disorder in females with fragile X syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence. Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1186/s11689-021-09362-5
  20. 20Mitchell RA, Mitchell M, Williams K. The autism spectrum disorder phenotype in children with tuberous sclerosis complex: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.15307
  21. 21Yang K, Geng Y, Zhou W, et al. Closing the Gap in Autism Genetics: Population-Specific Variants and the Imperative for Global Inclusion. Biological Psychiatry, 2026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2026.03.999
  22. 22de Wit MM, Morgan MJ, Libedinsky I, et al. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Phenotypic Correlates of the Autism Polygenic Score. JAACAP Open, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaacop.2025.04.001
  23. 23Tammimies K, Marshall CR, Walker S, et al. Molecular Diagnostic Yield of Chromosomal Microarray Analysis and Whole-Exome Sequencing in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder. JAMA, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.10078
  24. 24Harris HK, Sideridis GD, Barbaresi WJ, Harstad E. Pathogenic Yield of Genetic Testing in Autism Spectrum Disorder. Pediatrics, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2019-3211
  25. 25Bölte S, Girdler S, Marschik PB. The contribution of environmental exposure to the etiology of autism spectrum disorder. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-018-2988-4
  26. 26Hernández-Díaz S, Straub L, Bateman BT, et al. Risk of Autism after Prenatal Topiramate, Valproate, or Lamotrigine Exposure. New England Journal of Medicine, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa2309359
  27. 27Andrade C, Varadharajan N, Bascarane S, et al. Gestational Exposure to Valproate and Autism Spectrum Disorder or Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Offspring: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1111/acps.13797
  28. 28US Food and Drug Administration. Divalproex sodium prescribing information: boxed warning, use in specific populations, and pregnancy. openFDA drug label record, 2026. https://api.fda.gov/drug/label.json?search=openfda.generic_name:%22divalproex%20sodium%22
  29. 29Wu S, Wu F, Ding Y, Hou J, Bi J, Zhang Z. Advanced parental age and autism risk in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1111/acps.12666
  30. 30Chan JKN, Zhong AHF, Lam JYH, et al. Maternal and paternal antidepressant use before and during pregnancy and offspring risk of neurodevelopmental disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet Psychiatry, 2026. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(26)00089-1
  31. 31Sujan AC, Rickert ME, Öberg AS, et al. Associations of Maternal Antidepressant Use During the First Trimester of Pregnancy With Preterm Birth, Small for Gestational Age, Autism Spectrum Disorder, and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Offspring. JAMA, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.3413
  32. 32Brynge M, Sjöqvist H, Gardner RM, et al. Maternal infection during pregnancy and likelihood of autism and intellectual disability in children in Sweden: a negative control and sibling comparison cohort study. The Lancet Psychiatry, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(22)00264-4
  33. 33Dutheil F, Comptour A, Morlon R, et al. Autism spectrum disorder and air pollution: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Environmental Pollution, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.116856
  34. 34Yu M, Hu Y, Hou L, et al. The Effect of Maternal Folic Acid Supplementation on Neurodevelopmental Disorders in Offspring: An Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Nutrients, 2025. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17213443
  35. 35Braunschweig D, Krakowiak P, Duncanson P, et al. Autism-specific maternal autoantibodies recognize critical proteins in developing brain. Translational Psychiatry, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1038/tp.2013.50
  36. 36Orchid. Whole genome embryo screening for IVF. Company website, accessed October 2026. https://orchidhealth.com/
  37. 37Herasight. Embryo screening. Company website, accessed October 2026. https://www.herasight.com/
  38. 38Karavani E, Zuk O, Zeevi D, et al. Screening Human Embryos for Polygenic Traits Has Limited Utility. Cell, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2019.10.033
  39. 39Turley P, Meyer MN, Wang N, et al. Problems with Using Polygenic Scores to Select Embryos. The New England Journal of Medicine, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsr2105065
  40. 40Klausner L, Paraboschi EM, Mulas F, et al. Modeling polygenic embryo screening in real-world IVF patients demonstrates limitations on efficacy. medRxiv, 2026 (preprint, not peer reviewed). https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.04.16.26351002
  41. 41Forzano F, Antonova O, Clarke A, de Wert G, Hentze S, Jamshidi Y, Moreau Y, Perola M, Prokopenko I, Read A, Reymond A, Stefansdottir V, van El C, Genuardi M, on behalf of the Executive Committee and the Public and Professional Policy Committee of the European Society of Human Genetics. The use of polygenic risk scores in pre-implantation genetic testing: an unproven, unethical practice. European Journal of Human Genetics, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-021-01000-x
  42. 42Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine and Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Use of preimplantation genetic testing for polygenic disorders (PGT-P): an Ethics Committee opinion. Fertility and Sterility, 2026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2025.10.023
  43. 43Barlevy D, Furrer RA, Kalapatapu A, et al. Eugenics and polygenic embryo screening: Public, clinician, and patient perceptions of conditions versus traits. Genetics in Medicine, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gim.2025.101507
  44. 44Byres L, Morris E, Austin J. Exploring Autistic adults' perspectives on genetic testing for autism. Genetics in Medicine, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gim.2023.100021