Technology, AI and assistive tools
The everyday tools autistic adults use for sensory, communication, planning and work needs, what the studies show about AI helpers, and why AI text detectors may be a fairness risk for autistic writers. Most of the evidence is small and unreplicated; the one tool tested in a randomized trial so far is a stress app, and it helped on average while adding stress for many users.
The tools autistic adults use every day for sound, talking, planning and work. Some of these tools are well liked. The research on most of them is still small. One stress app was tested in a big trial. It helped some people but made others more stressed. AI programs that check writing may get autistic writing wrong. No one has tested this yet.
Headphones and other sensory tools Hypothesis
Noise-canceling headphones are one of the sensory tools autistic adults most often describe using. Sarah Hendrickx writes that they "have changed my life when outside the home" and that she has worn them in the cinema "to lessen the noise levels".c1 David William Plummer writes that they "reduce and soften" sound, making it "less distracting and less stressful".c2 Luke Beardon, a clinician, uses the word hyperacusis for this oversensitivity to everyday sound, and is careful: headphones help some people but "should not be an automatic 'go-to' solution for all of you who might have auditory sensitivities".c3 Other tools do the same job for other senses, from sunglasses to weighted blankets, chosen for what each person cannot filter out.
What the studies show is less than the use would suggest. A 2026 perspective article in Research in Developmental Disabilities set out the advantages and disadvantages of noise-canceling headphones for autistic students and concluded that they "should not be implemented without a plan and tailoring at an individual level".1 It is the authors' argument about students, and not a study.
A few small trials have been run in children, with mixed results. In one pilot, 21 autistic children aged 4 to 16 were enrolled after a two-week baseline and asked to use standard earmuffs and noise-canceling headphones, in random order, for two weeks each, but four refused to wear either. Goal attainment rose above baseline during the earmuffs (16 children analyzed), while the noise-canceling headphones did not differ from baseline (12 analyzed).2 In a separate trial, 13 autistic children aged 6 to 13 took part; their auditory attention and classroom listening improved, but their speech perception in noise did not change. That trial was funded by the maker of the earbuds it tested.3 Both are small, and neither is in adults.
No study found as of October 2026 has tested noise-canceling headphones as an intervention in autistic adults. So the tool is widely used, while the evidence that it helps adults has not kept pace.
Many autistic writers describe using noise-canceling headphones. Sarah Hendrickx says her headphones changed her life when she is out of the house.c1 David William Plummer writes that they "reduce and soften" sound.c2 He finds the sound "less distracting and less stressful" this way.c2 Luke Beardon is a clinician who works with autistic adults. He uses the word hyperacusis for this oversensitivity to everyday sound. He says headphones are not "an automatic 'go-to' solution" for everyone.c3 Some people do better with sunglasses or weighted blankets.
There is not much research. One 2026 article looked at noise-canceling headphones for autistic students. It listed good and bad points. It said they need "a plan and tailoring at an individual level".1 That is the writers' own opinion. It is about students, not adults, and it is not a study.
A few small studies have tried headphones in autistic children. One found earmuffs helped children, but noise-canceling headphones did not.2 Another found earbuds helped children pay attention in class, but did not help them hear speech in noise.3 That study was paid for by the earbud maker. Neither study was in adults.
No study found as of October 2026 has tested these headphones in autistic adults.
No study found as of October 2026 has tested noise-canceling headphones as an intervention in autistic adults. The section rests on what autistic writers report, on one 2026 perspective article about students, and on small trials in children, and says plainly that the adult trials are missing.
Oversensitivity to everyday sounds that most people find unremarkable.
No study found as of October 2026 has tested noise-canceling headphones in autistic adults. This part uses what autistic writers say, one 2026 article about students, and small studies in children.
Being bothered by everyday sounds that most people do not notice.
Apps, reminders and planning Emerging
Calendars, reminders and task apps hold time and sequence for people who find it easier to act on an external cue than an internal one. Megan Anna Neff writes that "external cues become essential in ensuring proper nutrition and hydration", because the body may not register hunger or thirst.c4
A qualitative study interviewed 106 autistic adults in Chile about how everyday technology shaped what they could decide and do. It found that technology supported their self-determination when it "preserved authorship of decisions", allowed simple refusal and reversible settings, protected attention, and respected privacy and sensory needs. It undercut them when settings were imposed by others, automation was opaque, or notifications and sensory demands were excessive.4 The authors report themes from one country, not measured effects.
One app has been tested more than once. In a randomized controlled trial, 214 autistic adults (mean age 50.5 years, 66.4% female) were assigned to one month of the Stress Autism Mate app or to a waitlist. The app group reported lower perceived stress (effect size 0.27), greater mental well-being (0.35) and better coping self-efficacy (0.16); the effects were small, and more use went with more improvement. Even so, 42.9% of app users said the app increased their stress.5
The other two studies of the same app point the same way but are weaker. A single-case study with three four-week phases found lower perceived stress and better coping and well-being while the app was used, and better resilience at follow-up after it stopped; it had no control group.6 Fifteen autistic adults who used the app valued its focus on noticing stress and its "non-coercive, intuitive, and minimalist interface", but found the tips poorly fitted to their lives and the repeated login frustrating.7 The trial, the single-case study and the interview study share one co-author, so they are not fully independent.
In a 17-month project, 15 autistic young adults built their own supportive devices and valued them most for "management, self-confidence, and social support", and as a "sense-making tool".8
How the tools are made matters as much as what they do. A systematic survey of 32 studies of assistive technology for autistic adults found "a general lack of requirements-driven design": many devices were built from the research literature rather than from what users said they needed, and evaluation was not standardized.9
Calendars, reminders and task apps are kinds of assistive technology. They hold time and order. They help people who act more easily on a cue from outside than one from inside. Megan Anna Neff writes that "external cues become essential" for eating and drinking.c4 The body may not tell you when you are hungry or thirsty.
One study asked 106 autistic adults in Chile about everyday technology. It found technology helped when it kept "authorship of decisions". It helped when people could say no easily. It helped when it protected attention and respected privacy and senses. It hurt when other people set it up. It hurt when it was hard to understand. It also hurt when it sent too many alerts.4 The study took place in one country. So it is not the whole picture.
One app has been tested more than once. In a randomized trial, 214 autistic adults used the Stress Autism Mate app for a month or waited.5 The app group felt less stress and better overall. The effects were small. But 42.9% of app users said the app made them more stressed.5 A small study of the same app had three four-week phases. It found less stress and better coping while people used it. They felt more resilient a month later. It had no control group.6 Fifteen adults who used the app liked that it helped them notice stress. But the tips did not fit their lives. Logging in again and again was annoying.7 The three app studies share one co-author.
In a 17-month project, 15 young autistic adults built their own tools. They valued them most for "management, self-confidence, and social support", and as a helpful way to understand themselves.8
How tools are made matters too. A review of 32 studies found that many devices were built from books and papers. They were not built from what autistic adults said they needed.9
One randomized trial, one single-case study, and several small qualitative studies. The trial was single and not replicated, its effects were small, and the SAM studies share one co-author.
Any device, app or tool that supports a person with a disability with daily living, communication or work.
One randomized trial of 214 people, one small single-case study, and a few small interview studies. The trial was done once. Its effects were small, and the studies share one co-author.
Any device, app or tool that helps a disabled person with daily life, communication or work.
Text instead of speech Emerging
Many autistic adults reach for writing where speech is expected. A four-month study followed smartphone use passively in 44 autistic adults and 54 non-autistic adults; 27 autistic and 33 non-autistic participants had usable data. The autistic participants spent more of their communication time in written channels than spoken ones.10 The study followed a small group and shows what people chose.
A survey of 165 autistic adults aged 18 to 35 found that noisy or unpredictable settings went with "word loss, scripting, and social withdrawal", and that talking with non-autistic people took more effort and more masking than talking with autistic people.11
Autistic writers describe the same pull. Luke Beardon notes that "plenty of autistic adults cannot bear using the phone".c5 Orion Kelly writes that "the idea that you must have voice conversations" is "often unnecessary" when a message can be typed with less anxiety.c6 Sarah Nannery writes that written communication was "preferable, because it limited the potential for confusion and distracting emotions".c7 For people who do not speak, typed and aided communication is simply how they communicate. See AAC and Nonspeaking communication.
Many autistic adults write when other people would speak. One study watched phone use for four months. It followed 44 autistic adults and 54 non-autistic adults. In the end it had data from 27 autistic adults. They spent more time writing than talking.10 The study followed a small group. It shows what people chose, not what helped them.
A survey of 165 autistic adults aged 18 to 35 asked about talking. Noisy or busy places went with losing words and going quiet. Talking with people who are not autistic took more effort and more masking.11
Autistic writers say the same thing. Luke Beardon writes that many "cannot bear using the phone".c5 Orion Kelly writes that having voice conversations is "often unnecessary".c6 Sarah Nannery writes that writing was "preferable, because it limited the potential for confusion and distracting emotions".c7 Some people do not speak. For them, typed or aided communication is the only way to talk. That is covered in AAC and Nonspeaking communication.
One real-world monitoring study (27 autistic and 33 non-autistic adults with usable data) and one survey, both small and single. They record preference and self-report, not whether writing works better.
One study that watched phone use and one survey. Both were small. They show what people prefer, not what works better.
AI as a daily helper Emerging
Generative AI tools, mostly chatbots, have become part of daily life for some autistic adults. A scoping review of 117 papers published between 2019 and 2025 found a growing range of AI applications for neurodivergent users across education, health, rehabilitation and work, but "research remains fragmented and often lacks long-term perspectives", and most studies lacked neurodivergent user participation and handled sensory and cognitive differences poorly.12
An autoethnography by eight neurodivergent "power users" described using generative AI to code-switch between settings, to regulate emotion and to reach information, and concluded that it "can help neurodivergent users to reclaim their agency in systems that diminish their autonomy and self-determination".13 The same authors are clear about the cost: AI use "is often not just a tool for access but a mechanism for survival—a means of masking, conforming, and mitigating bias", and one wrote that an AI-drafted email "took away my entire voice" until it was edited back toward her own.13
Studies of particular uses are small. In one uncontrolled study, autistic adolescents and adults improved at asking questions with an AI program, and the gains carried into conversation with people.14 A feasibility study of 16 autistic participants aged 15 to 28 found an AI communication tool went with clearer communication, lower anxiety and higher confidence, but its authors say no causal conclusion is possible without a control group.15 A participatory study of 20 autistic adults in Singapore named workplace uses for a large language model: help with planning and organizing, a way to reflect, and a way to explain their needs to colleagues. The authors caution that general-purpose models may "reinforce masking" by pushing neurotypical norms.16 A proof-of-concept study of 12 adults found a chatbot acceptable for preparing for an autism assessment.17
Use carries risks too. One case report describes psychiatric decompensation after heavy chatbot use in an autistic person.18
Some autistic adults use AI tools every day, mostly chatbots. A review looked at 117 papers about AI tools for neurodivergent people. The papers ran from 2019 to 2025. The tools were used in school, health and work. But the research was "fragmented and often lacks long-term perspectives". Most studies did not include neurodivergent people. Many handled differences in senses and thinking poorly.12
Eight neurodivergent people who use AI a lot wrote about their own experience. They used AI to change how they speak in different places, to calm their feelings, and to find information. They said it "can help neurodivergent users to reclaim their agency in systems that diminish their autonomy and self-determination".13 They also said what it costs. AI use "is often not just a tool for access but a mechanism for survival". One person said an email written by AI "took away my entire voice" until she changed it back.13
Studies of single uses are small. One small study had no control group. Autistic teens and adults there got better at asking questions with an AI program. The change carried into real talk with people.14 Another small study found an AI tool went with clearer talk, less worry and more confidence. The people were 15 to 28 years old. The authors say no one can prove cause without a control group.15 Twenty autistic adults in Singapore named ways a large language model could help at work. It could help with planning, and with explaining their needs. The authors warn these tools may "reinforce masking".16 A small study of 12 adults found a chatbot was acceptable for getting ready for an autism assessment.17
There are dangers too. One case report describes an autistic person whose mental health got worse after heavy chatbot use.18
Small feasibility and qualitative studies, one autoethnography, and one scoping review. No randomized trial of an AI helper, no independent replication, and most studies did not include autistic people in their design.
A program trained on large amounts of text that generates and answers language, such as a chatbot.
The autoethnography above is a detailed account of how neurodivergent "power users" actually use generative AI, including what it costs them.13
Small studies, one set of personal accounts, and one review. No big trial of an AI helper. Most studies did not ask autistic people to help design them.
A computer program trained on a huge amount of text. It can write and answer in everyday language. A chatbot is one example.
The autoethnography above is a detailed account of how neurodivergent "power users" actually use generative AI, including what it costs them.13
When AI judges autistic writing Hypothesis
AI text detectors now run on school essays, university work and job applications, and they are not reliable. The clearest evidence that they misfire comes from a different group. A study found that detectors frequently misclassified non-native English writing as AI-generated,19 and a 2026 systematic review of 27 studies in health-professions education found that, across the six experimental studies it included, detectors labeled non-native English writing as AI in 50.2% to 61.3% of cases, against under 5% for native writers.20
Detectors run on features such as how predictable the next word is, and unusually formal or highly regular writing can read to them as machine-made, so autistic writers face the same risk of being wrongly accused. But no study found as of October 2026 has tested whether AI text detectors misclassify autistic people's writing. The concern is reasoned from the evidence about another group, which is why the section carries a hypothesis label.
Schools and companies now use AI text detectors on essays and job applications. These tools are not reliable. The clearest proof comes from another group. One study found detectors often said writing by non-native English speakers was made by AI.19 A 2026 review of 27 studies looked at six experiments. It found the detectors called non-native English writing AI in 50.2% to 61.3% of cases. For native writers it was under 5%.20
Detectors look at things like how predictable the next word is. Writing that is very formal or very regular can look machine-made to them. So autistic writers face the same risk of being wrongly accused. But no study found as of October 2026 has tested this in autistic people. That is why this part is a hypothesis.
No study found as of October 2026 has tested whether AI text detectors misclassify autistic people's writing. The nearest evidence is about a different group, non-native English writers, and extending it to autistic writers is an argument, not a test.
Programs that estimate whether a piece of writing was produced by a person or by an AI.
No study found as of October 2026 has tested whether AI text detectors get autistic people's writing wrong. The closest evidence is about a different group, people who speak English as a second language. Moving it to autistic writers is an argument, not a test.
Programs that guess whether a person or an AI wrote a piece of writing.
Who gets the tools Emerging
Access to these tools is uneven. The clearest evidence is about assistive technology at work. In a survey of 501 autistic adults about employment-related needs, three patterns emerged, and those with the highest needs reported greater life satisfaction than those in the middle group; greater awareness of assistive technology and older age went with belonging to the high-needs group.21 Both findings come from the same 501 adults. A second survey of 501 autistic adults, by the same lead author, found that support was wanted most for keeping a job, and named the barriers: "limited access, inadequate training, and social stigma", plus a wish for services that were "more person-centered and context-specific".22 The two surveys may draw on the same sample, so they are not independent. Interviews with 15 US stakeholders found that autistic job seekers who searched on their own "may not be using assistive technologies available" to them.23
Knowing what exists is part of the problem. In a survey of 52 parents of young autistic children from low-resourced communities, the barriers to services included not having looked for them and not knowing they existed, though that finding is about children rather than adults.24 One essay argues that wearable and AI-enabled accommodations might support autistic adults in real time, but only with "rigorous validation, independent replication, and robust privacy and data-governance safeguards". The essay proposes this; no trial has tested it.25
Not everyone can get these tools. The best evidence is about tools for work. One survey of 501 autistic adults asked about work needs. It found three groups with different needs. The group with the most needs reported greater life satisfaction than the middle group. Knowing more about these tools and being older went with being in the high-needs group.21 Both results come from the same 501 adults.
A second 501-person study, by the same lead author, asked about work again. People wanted help most with keeping a job. The problems were "limited access, inadequate training, and social stigma". People also wanted services that fit them better.22 The two studies may have asked the same people, so they are not independent. Interviews with 15 people in the US asked about finding work. Some autistic job seekers who looked alone "may not be using assistive technologies available" to them.23
Knowing what exists is part of the problem. A survey asked 52 parents of young autistic children in areas with fewer resources. Some had not looked for services and did not know they existed. That finding is about children, not adults.24 One essay argues that wearable and AI tools might help autistic adults in real time. But that only works if they are tested carefully and protect privacy. That is a proposal. No trial has tested it.25
Surveys and interviews, including two 501-person employment surveys by the same lead author that may draw on the same sample. All cross-sectional and self-report, and none followed people over time.
Surveys and interviews, including two 501-person studies by the same lead author. All asked people once. None followed them over time.
In the community Community
Autistic writers tend to describe the tools as things they shape to fit their own lives. Devon Price describes Rory, an autistic and ADHD advocate, making "Autism-friendly 'life hacks'" to "make regular life manageable".c8 Daniel M. Jones writes that he "created workarounds, hacks, tools, and tips" rather than trying to work like everyone else.c9
The tools writers name are small and specific. Megan Anna Neff sets timers and alarms to remember to eat and drink.c4 Bianca Toeps uses "a schedule for the day with set breaks, setting an alarm clock, or using a refillable water bottle that's always within reach".c10 For a project that feels impossible, Clara Törnvall suggests free AI services such as Goblin Tools, which "break down big projects that feel overwhelming into smaller parts" and build a to-do list.c11
Writers also describe the same tools turning on them. Neff calls the small items that reduce discomfort accommodations, so that choosing them is self-care rather than indulgence. Tools that others impose, that push a person to look typical, or that keep demanding attention are the ones writers say work against them.
Autistic writers often say the tools should fit their lives. Devon Price describes Rory, an autistic and ADHD advocate, making "Autism-friendly 'life hacks'" to make daily life easier.c8 Daniel M. Jones writes that he "created workarounds, hacks, tools, and tips" instead of trying to work like everyone else.c9
The tools these writers name are small. Megan Anna Neff sets timers and alarms to remember to eat and drink.c4 Bianca Toeps uses set breaks, an alarm clock, and a water bottle always within reach.c10 For a project that feels too big, Clara Törnvall suggests free AI services such as Goblin Tools. They "break down big projects that feel overwhelming into smaller parts".c11
Writers also say the same tools can work against them. Neff calls the small things that ease discomfort accommodations. She says choosing them is self-care. Tools that other people force on a person can cause problems. So can tools that push a person to look typical. So can tools that keep demanding attention.
How autistic writers describe the everyday tools they build and use. Not a research finding.
How autistic writers describe the everyday tools they build and use. This is not a research finding.
Sources
Research
- 1Herrebrøden M, Marentakis G, Dechsling A, et al. Advantages and disadvantages of noise-cancelling headphones for autistic students in educational settings. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 2026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2026.105301
- 2Ikuta N, Iwanaga R, Tokunaga A, Nakane H, Tanaka K, Tanaka G. Effectiveness of earmuffs and noise-cancelling headphones for coping with hyper-reactivity to auditory stimuli in children with autism spectrum disorder: a preliminary study. Hong Kong Journal of Occupational Therapy, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hkjot.2016.09.001
- 3Zanin J, Tomlin D, Rance G. Effectiveness of noise cancelling earbuds in reducing hearing and auditory attention deficits in children with autism. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 2024. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13164786
- 4Álvarez-Aguado I, Muñoz La Rivera F, Vega V, et al. From access to agency: how assistive and emerging technologies mediate self-determination in autistic adulthood. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 2026. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2025.2586641
- 5Spaargaren KL, Roke Y, Begeer SM, et al. A randomized controlled trial into the effectiveness of a mobile health application (SAM) to reduce stress and improve well-being in autistic adults. Autism, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613251346885
- 6Hoeberichts K, Roke Y, Niks I, van Harten PN. The effect of the stress autism mate app on perceived stress, coping, and resilience in adults with autism: a single-case experimental design. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 2024. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1347947
- 7van Asselt A, Roke Y, Hoeberichts K, et al. User experiences of the mobile Stress Autism Mate (SAM) application: a qualitative study among autistic adults not receiving mental health care. Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine, 2026. https://doi.org/10.1080/21642850.2026.2684373
- 8van Huizen JC, Staal WG, van der Voort MC, van Dijk J. Empowered by design: findings from a supportive technology research project with autistic young adults. Assistive Technology, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2025.2579654
- 9Wang M, Jeon M. Assistive technology for adults on the autism spectrum: a systematic survey. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2163568
- 10Turna M, Eckert J, Meier-Böke K, et al. Real world evidence for altered communication patterns in individuals with autism spectrum disorder. NPJ Digital Medicine, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-01545-x
- 11Miller ZA, Conner CM, Chang JC, Mazefsky CA. Navigating mixed-neurotype dialogue: environmental and affective influences on autistic speakers. Autism, 2026. https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613261469909
- 12Xu Z, Liu F, Xia G, et al. A scoping review of inclusive and adaptive human-AI interaction design for neurodivergent users. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 2026. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2025.2579822
- 13Glazko K, Cha J, Lewis A, et al. Autoethnographic insights from neurodivergent GAI "power users." Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1145/3706598.3713670
- 14Koegel LK, Ponder E, Bruzzese T, Lam MS. Using artificial intelligence to improve question asking in autistic adolescents and adults. Behavior Modification, 2026. https://doi.org/10.1177/01454455261477050
- 15Algahtani F. Using natural language processing to support digital communication in adolescents and young adults with autism spectrum disorder. PLOS ONE, 2026. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0352505
- 16Kan DD, Chuai A, Bong K, et al. Understanding the workplace needs of autistic adults in Singapore: insights to inform inclusive AI support. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 2026. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1825357
- 17Sadeghi Esfahlani S, Prothero L, Abdulmohdi N, et al. Feasibility and acceptability of an AI-driven conversational platform for structured autism history taking and referral support: mixed methods proof-of-concept study. JMIR Formative Research, 2026. https://doi.org/10.2196/100237
- 18Altinisik I, Ipek H, Sisman Z, Emul M. Psychiatric decompensation following AI chatbot use in autism spectrum disorder. Asian Journal of Psychiatry, 2026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajp.2026.104889
- 19Liang W, Yuksekgonul M, Mao Y, Wu E, Zou J. GPT detectors are biased against non-native English writers. Patterns, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2023.100779
- 20Ndacyayisenga JCY, Kidega C, Aciro Can L. The impact of generative artificial intelligence tools on assessment equity for non-native English-speaking medical students: a systematic review. BMC Medical Education, 2026. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-09303-7
- 21Zhou K, Kim J, Choi H. A person-centred, latent profile analysis of assistive technology needs among autistic adults in employment. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 2026. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2025.2583314
- 22Zhou K, Richard C, Zhai Y, Li D, Fry H. Employment-related assistive technology needs in autistic adults: a mixed-methods study. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 2025. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe15090170
- 23Garrison E, MacNeil S, Hantula DA, et al. Exploring the challenges and assistive technology for autistic job seekers across employment pathways. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2025.105155
- 24Kim J, Joshi B, Burke MM. Characterizing service receipt among families of young autistic children from low-resourced communities. International Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 2026. https://doi.org/10.1080/20473869.2026.2660340
- 25Ruttenberg D. Multimodal evidence and technology-enabled accommodations for autistic adults: an evidential framework for autism research and practice. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 2026. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1852731
Community sources
- c1Hendrickx S. Women and Girls on the Autism Spectrum: Understanding Life Experiences from Early Childhood to Old Age. Jessica Kingsley Publishers, 2024. Chapter "Adulthood".
- c2Plummer DW. Secrets of the Autistic Millionaire. Self-published, 2021. Chapter "Parenting with Autism".
- c3Beardon L. Avoiding Anxiety in Autistic Adults: A Guide for Autistic Wellbeing. Sheldon Press, 2021. Chapter "Sensory issues".
- c4Neff MA. Self-Care for Autistic People: 100+ Ways to Recharge, De-Stress, and Unmask! Adams Media, 2024. Chapter "Embrace Adaptive Self-Care Practices". Megan Anna Neff's site
- c5Beardon L. Autism in Adults. Sheldon Press, 2021. Chapter "Employment".
- c6Kelly O. Autism Feels ...: An Earthling's Guide. Dean Publishing, 2023. Chapter "Phone Calls".
- c7Nannery S, Nannery L. What to Say Next: Successful Communication in Work, Life, and Love - with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Tiller Press, 2021. Chapter "Written Communication versus In-Person Communication".
- c8Price D. Unmasking Autism: Discovering the New Faces of Neurodiversity. Harmony Books, 2022. Chapter "Do Your Own Thing, Your Own Way". Devon Price's site
- c9Jones DM. Autism for Adults: An Approachable Guide to Living Excellently on the Spectrum. Page Street Publishing, 2023. Chapter "Introduction". Daniel M. Jones's site
- c10Toeps B. But You Don't Look Autistic at All. Self-published (English edition), 2020. Chapter "Understimulation". Bianca Toeps's site
- c11Törnvall C. The Autist's Guide to the Galaxy. Scribe Publications, 2024. Chapter "Tips: Everyday Life".